Non-urgent paediatric Emergency Department presentations contribute to overcrowding, poor patient health outcomes, and burden acute healthcare services. A study was conducted to explore motivations and factors that influence decision-making processes of parents who presented their child to ED for non-urgent conditions. An exploratory study using a qualitative descriptive design was undertaken to address research aims. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of eight parents who presented their child (birth to 14 years of age), to ED for non-urgent conditions. Parental decision-making regarding ED presentations were influenced by a constellation of factors; however, three main themes emerged. These included Parental Anxiety , There is Only One Place , and Mitigating Perceived Delay or Inaccessibility . As such, centred on how parents addressed their anxiety when a child was ill, accessibility and capacity of EDs to provide immediate relief to parents and children, and parents’ perception that accessing other healthcare services impacted crucial time for treatment. EDs remain a preferred healthcare service to address non-urgent paediatric needs, despite adequate health literacy among participants. When improving models of care within EDs, non-urgent presentations must be considered, including management of parental anxiety, along with establishing non-urgent care adjacent to or integrated within an ED.

This review aimed to analyze the effects of laughter-inducing therapy on anxiety, pain, and stress in children by synthesizing existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Researchers conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, following the Cochrane Collaboration’s methodology for systematic literature review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We selected and evaluated 12 studies for quality using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis, which showed that clown therapy produced a moderate effect on pain relief and a large effect on anxiety reduction in pediatric patients. In conclusion, this review highlights the potential of laughter-inducing therapies as an effective clinical intervention for reducing anxiety, pain, and stress in pediatric patients. These findings provide evidence supporting the use of laughter-based interventions as alternative or complementary approaches in medical settings. The review also underscores the need for further research across diverse clinical environments to validate the effectiveness of laughter-inducing therapies in broader pediatric populations. Overall, the incorporation of laughter-inducing therapy into clinical practice may play a valuable role in enhancing the overall well-being of pediatric patients.

Practices for promoting a child’s best interests in rehabilitation are not sufficiently understood. This study describes the practices from the perspectives of professionals and parents of children with disabilities. We conducted 11 interviews: 5 in focus groups with professionals (n = 27 [69%]), 3 with parents (n = 9 [23%]), and 3 individual interviews of paediatric neurologists (n = 3 [8%]). We used a qualitative approach, which included inductive content analysis, to examine the transcribed interview data. The practices for promoting a child’s best interests consisted of collective framing of child-specific rehabilitation, fostering a fulfilling daily life for the child, and ensuring appropriate rehabilitation. This was enhanced by using child-specific practices and comprehensively understanding the child’s rehabilitation in everyday life but was hindered by the absence of an established process and guidelines. The results highlighted substantial challenges in collaboration aligned with the child’s best interests, enabling the child’s active participation, and addressing the individual needs of the child and family. Promoting best interests through family–professional partnerships by using a systemic and ecological approach could guide the rehabilitation process and ensure the child’s right to participate.

The aim of this study was to investigate Swedish children’s and parents’ attitudes and knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination a year after gender-neutral HPV vaccination was introduced in Sweden’s national immunization program (NIP). Additional information about HPV and vaccine was provided in the extended immunazation program. In total, 276 parents and 206 children from 22 School Health Services responded to a web-based survey. Results showed that half of the children and about a third of the parents received additional Public Health Agency information about HPV vaccination, and a majority were satisfied. Parents considered HPV vaccination being important for their children’s health, and both children and parents considered it important to vaccinate all genders against HPV. Both children and parents rated school nurses as most reliable source of HPV vaccination information. Teachers were also a common source of HPV and HPV vaccination information for children. Further research among teachers in Sweden is needed to explore their knowledge and abilities to inform students and parents about HPV and vaccination.

Wish-granting is a form of positive psychological intervention that seeks to promote child wellbeing by fulfilling a wish of their choice. This study aimed to explore families’ experiences of receiving wish-granting interventions to understand how wishes impact wellbeing. Fifty in-depth semi-structured interviews were carried out with 22 families (23 parents, 17 young people); seven charity volunteers; and five health professionals, recruited from the United Kingdom. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic framework approach. Findings suggest wishes improve wellbeing by increasing positive emotion; by broadening families’ horizons; by providing an alternative focus; and by fostering opportunities for togetherness. To grow and maintain impact, consideration should be given to developing strategies that increase anticipation; keep wish memories alive; encourage children to make wishes that stretch their perceived limitations; and facilitate families to share their experiences and ‘give back’ to the community.

Despite development of healthcare charters supporting Article 12 of The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, children and young people remain largely silenced in discussions about their healthcare. This article is based on the premise that children and young people should be able to exercise their right to express their views and be heard in all matters that affect their lives. This study examined children’s and young people’s experiences of expressing their views and having them heard in an Australian healthcare context. Using child-centred inquiry and ‘draw, write, and tell’ methods, data were collected from 20 children and young people. Five factors that supported children and young people to express their views and have their views heard were identified: time, relationships with health professionals, communication, teamwork, and family support. By paying attention to these factors, clinicians and others in health settings can better facilitate child-centred practices and support children and young people to express their views and have those views heard.

Pain in hospitalised children is common, yet inadequately treated. Electronic medical records (EMRs) can improve care quality and outcomes during hospitalisation. Little is known about how clinicians use EMRs in caring for children with pain. This national cross-sectional survey examined the perceptions of clinician-EMR users about current and potential use of EMRs in children’s pain care. One hundred and ninety-four clinicians responded (n = 81, 74% nurses; n = 21, 19% doctors; n = 7, 6% other); most used Epic (n = 53/109, 49%) or Cerner (n = 42/109, 38%). Most (n = 84/113, 74%) agreed EMRs supported their initiation of pharmacological pain interventions. Fewer agreed EMRs supported initiation of physical (n = 49/113, 43%) or psychological interventions (n = 41/111, 37%). Forty-four percent reported their EMR had prompt reminders for pain care. Prompts were perceived as useful (n = 40/51, 78%). Most agreed EMRs supported pain care provision (n = 94/110, 85%) and documentation (n = 99/111, 89%). Only 39% (n = 40/102) agreed EMRs improved pain treatment, and 31% (n = 32/103) agreed EMRs improved how they involve children and families in pain care. Findings provide recommendations for EMR designs that support clinicians’ understanding of the multidimensionality of children’s pain and drive comprehensive assessments and treatments. This contribution will inform future translational research on harnessing technology to support child and family partnerships in care.

This study addresses the paucity of research on parents of extremely preterm adolescents (born <27 weeks of gestation) and their experiences within the framework of parental determinism. We conducted semi-structured interviews with twenty-two mothers and one father. Data were analysed thematically, revealing three overarching themes and eight subthemes shaping parental accounts. These themes centred on parental ambitions for their children, their perceptions of their child’s abilities, and the parenting behaviours employed to support parental aspirations. Parents’ actions were influenced by their ambitions and the belief that they could impact their child’s future independence. While some parents adopted ‘trusting’, non-intensive parenting behaviours, those anticipating challenges for their child’s future independence resorted to intensive parenting practices. These findings align with the concept of parental determinism, emphasising the perceived causal link between present parental actions and future child outcomes. In the context of extreme prematurity, a nuanced understanding of parental perceptions regarding their child’s future independence aligned with a delicate balance between hope and realistic aspiration is crucial for enhancing parental support and well-being.

With a growing 25.5 million people in the United States experiencing limited-English proficiency (LEP), there is a concern over these individuals’ experiences in healthcare. Health outcomes of LEP status are well-documented for adults in hospitals; however, less is known about patient experience, pediatric populations, and primary care settings. This study investigated differences in caregiver satisfaction between families with and without LEP receiving healthcare for their child. A sample of 25,118 caregivers whose children from birth to 17 years had met with any healthcare providers in the past year was used. Analyses consisted of unpaired t-tests comparing mean satisfaction of LEP and English-proficient (EP) caregivers in the domains of how often primary healthcare providers spent enough time with the child, listened, provided specific information, demonstrated sensitivity to the family’s values, and made the respondent feel like a partner. In all aspects of caregiver satisfaction, mean satisfaction scores were significantly lower for LEP caregivers than EP caregivers. The largest drops were seen in perceived time and sensitivity. These results highlight a need to ensure LEP families receive equitable and high-quality primary care services, ultimately building trust in the healthcare system and improving children’s health and well-being.

Adolescents face issues regarding physical health, mental health, sexual health, drug and alcohol problems, stress, and peer pressure. Little is known about adolescents’ help-seeking behaviours in relation to health concerns. The general practitioner (GP) is usually the first point of contact for adolescents. The aim of this systematic review was to identify, describe, and summarize evidence on barriers and enablers experienced by adolescents when accessing GP-led primary care services. Systematic searches using four electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and SocINDEX) were conducted and the quality of the included studies was appraised. Six studies were included in this review. Findings indicate that barriers to GP access relate to trust, confidentiality, privacy, and communication. Adolescents also reported barriers such as transport, cost, and lack of information. Adolescents reported enablers being services that are sensitive to their needs, healthcare professionals who understand them, and services that are flexible regarding out of hours access. Listening to and acting on the voice of adolescents is important to developing youth-friendly services.