To describe a concept of standardized preoperative one-day evaluation before urinary reconstructive or diversion surgery for the treatment of neurogenic lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction, and to evaluate its feasibility and its impact on the care pathway. All patients who underwent a one-day standardized evaluation before a urinary reconstructive or derivation surgery for the treatment of neurogenic LUT dysfunction between January 2017 and December 2021 in our institution were included. Data were collected retrospectively from standardized reports. The main outcome was the rate of completion of the tests and consultations planned during this evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the findings from the one-day evaluation and changes in the urological surgical strategy at different time points within one year. One hundred and thirty-one patients benefited from this one-day standardized evaluation. The overall completeness rate of the data collected was 77.5%, increasing from 62.3% in 2017 to 89.3% in 2021. The urological surgical plan was modified for 19.1% of patients following this preoperative evaluation. The indication was then confirmed for 114 patients (87.0%) by the multidisciplinary meeting and was carried out unchanged during the following year for 89 patients (67.9%). An associated colostomy procedure was proposed for 18.3% of patients and was finally performed in 11.5%. A standardized multidisciplinary preoperative one-day evaluation before performing reconstructive or diversion surgery for the treatment of neurogenic LUT dysfunction seems feasible and makes it possible to optimize the surgical plan and adapt the course of care.

Physical examination appears to be a limiting factor of teleconsultation (TC). We evaluated the feasibility of self-percussion of the lumbar fossae (sPLF) and TC for simple renal colic (SRC) in comparison with a face-to-face consultation (FC). We performed a comparative prospective study in two steps. First: evaluation of the quality of an sPLF on a standardized patient in TC, without and with tutorial. Secondarily: evaluation of a TC and a FC for a SRC with a standardized patient in real conditions. Evaluation using objective clinical scores and qualitative scales by an observer, the standardized patient and the practitioner himself. Forty-two practitioners were included in the study. In the absence of a tutorial, the sPLF was most often "poorly done". The tutorial led to a significant improvement in the quality of sPLF. There was no difference in diagnostic and therapeutic performance among senior physicians between TC and FC. The therapeutic performances of the interns were significantly lower in TC without his being aware of it. The qualitative scores were significantly lower in TC vs FC according to the practitioners, the standardized patient and the observer. An sPLF is feasible but its practice should be taught. Unlike interns, senior physicians were able to perform a TC comparable to FC for the management of SRC. TC and telesemiology therefore require dedicated training and an experienced practitioner.

We aimed to determine the effectiveness of penis-root masturbation (PRM), a newly defined behavioral therapy (BT) technique, in patients with unsuccessful medical treatment due to premature ejaculation (PE). The study included 35 patients aged 25-43 years, who were diagnosed with lifelong PE. Patients and their partners were informed about the PRM technique and asked to practice PRM three times a week for three months, with or without sexual intercourse. The patients' Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) scores and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) were recorded and compared before PRM training (T0) and at the third (T3) month after the start of PRM training. The mean±SD PEDT scores were 16.26±1.94 at T0, 10.63±1.14 at T3. When compared to T0, the PEDT values at T3 were significantly lower (P=0.021). In terms of IELT, the mean T3 values (192.43±56.71) were significantly longer (P=0.035) than at T0 (50.43±13.84seconds). PRM BT shows promise for lifelong PE patients who do not benefit from or discontinue to pharmacotherapy. Larger prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a public health issue. The diagnostic strategy for PCa is well codified and assessed by digital rectal examination, PSA testing and multiparametric MRI, which may or may not lead to prostate biopsies. The formal benefit of organized PCa screening, studied more than 10 years ago at an international scale and for all incomers, is not demonstrated. However, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have evolved since the pivotal studies. The contribution of MRI and targeted biopsies, the widespread use of active surveillance for unsignificant PCa, the improvement of surgical techniques and radiotherapy… have allowed a better selection of patients and strengthened the interest for an individualized approach, reducing the risk of overtreatment. Aiming to enhance coverage and access to screening for the population, the European Commission recently promoted the evaluation of an organized PCa screening strategy, including MRI. The lack of screening programs has become detrimental to the population and must shift towards an early detection policy adapted to the risk of each individual.

New methods of male contraception are being studied: male hormonal contraception, reversible occlusion of the vas deferens and thermal contraception. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of these methods among men. We carried out an opinion survey from July to November 2021, through an anonymous questionnaire distributed in France on the internet. The subjects were adult, heterosexual men. Of the 1545 connections to the questionnaire, we analyzed the 905 complete questionnaires. Seventy three percent of men say they are in favor of adopting an innovative male contraceptive method as their primary contraception: 64% in favor of reversible occlusion of the vas deferens, 22% in favor of male hormonal contraception and 13% in favor of thermal contraception. Despite its limitations, this study shows that a significant part of the male population is interested in innovative methods of contraception that concern them. This should encourage continued research in this area.

Contraceptive vasectomy is a male sterilization technique by interrupting the continuity of the vas deferens. The primary endpoint of our study was to evaluate patients' feelings of vasectomy under local anesthesia. We collected responses from 108 patients who had a vasectomy under local anesthesia at the Center Hospitalier Annecy Genevois between January 1, 2020 and April 30, 2022. The average age of patients at the time of the vasectomy was 40years old. Patients were satisfied with the level of information before vasectomy for 104 of them (96%). The level of pain felt during the intervention evaluated by Visual Analog Scale had an average of 3.4/10 (standard deviation 2.4). The degree of satisfaction during the procedure was excellent/good for 103 patients (95%). In the follow-up, we reported 10 patients (10%) with a complication (hematoma, infection or healing problem). The retrospective evaluation found 103 patients (95%) who would repeat the procedure under the same modalities and 106 patients (98%) who would recommend vasectomy under local anesthesia to a relative/friend. Vasectomy under local anesthesia is increasingly common, so it is important to assess the feelings of patients with this modality. Our study had the advantage of bringing together a large number of patients over a short period with several different operators. Overall satisfaction with the hospitalization process and the procedure was very satisfactory. The patient journey was significantly simplified with local anesthesia instead of general anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

In recent years, improved diagnosis of prostate cancer has allowed the development of focal therapy, in order to reduce the morbidity of treatments. Our study assesses the medium-term oncological and functional results of FocalOne® HIFU treatment in localized prostate cancer. This is a retrospective, multicentre study including patients with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer treated with Focal one HIFU between November 2014 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was the retreatment rate and subgroup analyses were performed to identify predictive factors of retreatment. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were included with a median follow-up of 25.5 months. Seventy percent of patients had clinical stage T2, 64% had an ISUP score of 2 or 3 on initial biopsies and 38% were treated with hemi-ablation. Follow-up biopsies were performed in 76.6% of patients during follow-up with 21.8% having clinically significant cancers. The retreatment rate at 24 months was 37.2%, with positive biopsies being the primary criterion for retreatment. Patients with a PSA>8ng/mL had a significantly higher retreatment rate. Finally, morbidity remained acceptable with 5.8% of patients requiring reoperation for complications and 21% for de novo erectile dysfunction. Our results are in agreement with those of the literature, seeming to indicate a lower morbidity of the focal treatment by HIFU compared to the radical treatments while offering an acceptable oncological control. Prospective randomized trials are ongoing.

The purpose of this review was to present the different genitourinary complications following pelvic radiotherapy as well as their assessment and treatments. A review of literature was conducted using Medline/Pubmed database without period restriction. In order to write this article, we also use the 2016 AFSOS, SFRO and AFU recommendations. On the one hand, early side effects are common and mild. The symptomatic treatments available generally provide effective relief to patients. On the other hand, late adverse effects need long and complex care. Its side effects alter the quality of life and can be life-threatening. The effects of radiotherapy are irreversible. Except hyperbaric oxygen therapy and hyaluronic acid/chondroitin sulfate instillations, treatments remain symptomatic. Urethrovesical fibroscopy is essential in cases of gross hematuria, and urodynamic assessment (or videourodynamic) can be used in cases of severe vesicosphincter disorders. Pharmacological treatments are less effective than in non-radiation patients, and the morbidity of surgical treatments is higher in this population. Genitourinary complications after pelvic radiotherapy are frequent and mild in the early phase but rare and severe in the late phase. Their management is based on a vast diagnostic and therapeutic arsenal, but the treatments are only symptomatic, and the sequelae of radiotherapy remains, to date, irreversible.

The main objectives of interventional stone treatment are stone removal, symptom elimination, and kidney function preservation. After treatment of kidney stones (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [ESWL], or endoscopy), fragments may remain in the kidney, either deliberately left in place or due to treatment failure (i.e. residual stone [RS], resistant to ESWL, left or inaccessible by endoscopy), or due to failure to eliminate the obtained fragments (i.e. residual fragments [RF]). Their management may differ. The most commonly used definition of RF in the literature is based on a size cut-off (≤4mm) and on three criteria: spontaneous clearance rate, secondary intervention rate, and disease progression rate. RF may be spontaneously eliminated (42%), persist and increase in size (32%), or become complicated and require a secondary urological procedure (36%). Like for the initial treatment, it is important to consider the stone composition for the treatment decision-making concerning RS/RF. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis) (EAU, 2022) and their adaptability to the French context.