Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Export
Sort by: Relevance
  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf036
Comparing and contrasting the definitions of genetic data in Chinese and EU law
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Ruoxin Su + 1 more

  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf037
Evolving approaches to cross-border data flows: Latin American and African perspectives
  • Dec 27, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • María Vásquez Callo-Müller + 1 more

  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf035
Permitted by design? Article 10(5) AIA, sensitive data, and the legal illusion of bias correction
  • Dec 24, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Arnoud Engelfriet

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf033
Should data protection authorities enforce the <i>AI Act</i> ? Lessons from EU-wide enforcement data
  • Dec 17, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Joanna Mazur + 2 more

  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf030
Risk and fundamental rights infringements as a form of ‘damage’ per Article 82 GDPR
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Stephan Mulders

There is a lot of uncertainty about the meaning of 'damage' in Article 82 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It is challenging to define damage for GDPR infringements because of the nature of personal data and because of personality harms. The severity test commonly used to assess compensation for damage to personality rights is not suitable for GDPR infringements. This article proposes a solution by arguing and demonstrating the application of established fundamental rights norms and risk evaluation techniques to harms caused by GDPR infringements under Article 82 of the GDPR.

  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf026
Transferring data to foreign authorities under Chinese data protection law
  • Nov 23, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Jingru Wang

  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf028
Managing the intersection between competition law and data protection in Nigeria
  • Nov 21, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Fochi Amabilis Nwodo + 1 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf012
Behavioural profiling for age assurance: do the ends justify the means?
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Mohammed Raiz Shaffique + 1 more

Effective Protection of Fundamental Rights in a pluralist world

  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf027
Data governance in Latin America: an increasing alignment with the G20
  • Nov 17, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Ana Brian Nougrères

  • Research Article
  • 10.1093/idpl/ipaf023
Fostering the interplay between data portability and competition law: <i>the Brussels effect</i> and its localization in Korea
  • Nov 13, 2025
  • International Data Privacy Law
  • Yo Sop Choi