Sort by
Modern Scientific Data Governance Framework

Science has entered the era of Big Data with new challenges related to data governance, stewardship, and management. The existing data governance practices must catch up to ensure proper data management. Existing data governance policies and stewardship best practices tend to be disconnected from operational data management practices and enforcement and mainly exist in well-meaning documents or reports. These governance policies are, at best, partially implemented and rarely monitored or audited. In addition, existing governance policies keep adding additional data management steps that require a human, ‘a data steward’, in the loop, and the cost of data management can no longer scale proportionately with the current and future increased data volume and complexity. The goal for developing an updated data governance framework is to modernize scientific data governance to the reality of Big data and align it with the current technology trends such as cloud computing and AI. The goals of this framework are two folds. One is to ensure thoroughness that the governance adequately covers the entire data life cycle. Two, provide a practical approach that offers a consistent and repeatable process for different projects. Three core principles ground this framework. First, focus on just enough governance and prevent data governance from becoming a roadblock toward the scientific process. Remove any unnecessary processes and steps. Second, automate data management steps where possible. Actively remove steps that require  ‘human in the loop’ within the management process to be efficient and scale with increasing data. Third, all the processes should continually be optimized using quantified metrics to streamline the monitoring and auditing workflows. 

Relevant
3-D Printing for Task Training & Simulations: A Collaborative Process between Nurses and Engineers

This paper presents the process of developing 3D printed task trainers and simulators for healthcare education. The process is a collaborative effort between the College of Nursing at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) and the UAH Systems Management and Production Center. The three year collaboration led to development of a five-phase feedback and development process which is continually refined and now used for the development of all 3D printed training simulations in the interprofessional center. The first phase consists of nursing faculty and center engineers conducting a needs assessment. The output of this phase is a prioritized list of potential simulations. The second phase consists of a team of engineering students developing the 3D training simulation. The third phase is evaluating the simulation. A number of iterations are generally necessary to have a simulation that satisfied nursing requirements. The nursing faculty is actively involved throughout the process to assure the desired characteristics and fullest medical design to include texture, elasticity, density, strength, color and realism. The fourth phase is implementing the simulation into the program. The fifth phase is to document and evaluate the process. During the past several years a number of 3-D products have been developed and are now implemented. As an example, a 3D printed brain with multiple sclerosis (MS) is discussed in this paper. The 3D printed brain is being used to assist nurses better understand and more easily visualize lesions in MS patients. The 3D printed trainers are being used to provide nursing students with much needed hands-on experiences, to allow students to practice specific skills at a lower cost and to gain these skills in a safe setting. Included in this paper are a description of the process used to develop the training simulators, the use of simulators in nurse training the results and benefits.

Relevant