Sort by
Solvent selection for fatty acid residue analysis of archeologicial artifacts

AbstractResidue analysis has rapidly become one of the most useful techniques for determining an artifact function and revealing insight into paleodiets. The success of analytical residue analysis often lies with the first preparatory step, where the residue is extracted from the object. Detection of a residue requires effective solvation of the material, and there is a large range of potential solvents. One purpose of this study is to determine the efficiency of various solvents for the extraction of fatty acids from charcoal, a material that is ubiquitous, easily identified, remarkably stable in the archaeological record but, most importantly for this research, retains fats extremely well. This investigation examines the removal efficiency of model fatty acids from carbonized wood samples. The strong affinity of lipids to charcoal makes carbonized wood ideal for retaining them, but also makes their extraction extremely challenging and thus an ideal benchmark for solvent extraction characterization. Several solvents (benzene, chloroform, hexane, methanol and water) are used to determine the quantitative extraction efficiency of tripalmitin. While benzene and chloroform perform best for some wood types, neither solvent is better for all carbonized wood. Correlations between the chemical properties of the solvents and the effectiveness of the extraction provide guidance for solvents. Findings indicate solvent characteristics including dipole moment, dielectric constant, hydrogen bonding, and molecular weight all play an important role in extraction of fat from a charcoal matrix. Results presented should provide guidelines to allow for more effective residue extration and more accurate lipid analysis.

Open Access
Relevant
Ultrasound-assisted Matrix Solid Phase Dispersion for the HPLC-DAD analysis of amphenicols in shrimps

AbstractUltrasound-assisted matrix solid phase dispersive extraction was applied for the selective isolation and clean-up of three amphenicol antibiotics, chloramphenicol (CAP), thiamphenicol (TAP) and florfenicol (FFC) from shrimp. The target antibiotics were separated on a LiChroCART-LiChrospher® 100 RP-18 (5 μm, 250 × 4 mm) analytical column in less than 9 min, with isocratic elution using a mixture of 70% ammonium acetate (0.05 M) and 30% acetonitrile (v/v). Matrix Solid Phase Dispersion protocol was optimized in terms of extraction sorbent and elution solvent. Two polymer based (Oasis and Nexus) sorbents and one silica based (Lichrolut C18) were compared and different elution solvents such as methanol, acetone, acetonitrile and isopropanol were evaluated based on the achieved recovery rates as well as on the cleanup efficiency. The extraction procedure was performed with and without sonication to evaluate the impact of ultrasounds. TAP and FFC were monitored at 234 nm and CAP at 280 nm by a photodiode array detector. The method was validated according to the European Union Decision 2002/657/EC in terms of linearity, selectivity, stability, accuracy, precision and sensitivity. Detection capability values (CCb) were 64.6 μg/kg for TAP and 1046.8 μg/kg for FFC and 63.8 μg/ kg for CAP.

Open Access
Relevant
Non-chromatographic methods focused on speciation of arsenic and selenium in food and environmental samples

AbstractSpeciation is a promising and essential tool in the evaluation of the contamination of metals in food and environmental samples. In this context, information about the species of these elements is important considering that toxic effects are directly related to their chemical forms. The enormous progress in combining separation and detection techniques has enabled the effective chemical speciation. However, a possible source of error in studies of speciation occurs during sample preparation. Appropriate treatment of samples is necessary in order to ensure that interconversion between the species does not occur during the experimental procedure prior to the final analysis. In this review, methods of sample preparation for the determination of arsenic and selenium in food and environmental samples are discussed. We decided to focus on these elements since they account for around 50% of all speciation studies. Procedures including conventional extraction, microwave-assisted extraction and sonolysis are discussed as simple ways to ensure species selectivity. The main purpose of this review is to provide an update on the recent literature concerning the strategies for arsenic and selenium speciation and to critically discuss their advantages and weaknesses compared with the commonly accepted approach of combining non-chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques. The problems focused on involve sampling, sample preparation and storage, as well as changes in ‘species information’ that occur during the use of various separation technologies. These difficulties are described along with recent developments aimed at overcoming these potential issues.

Open Access
Relevant