What is the difference between cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and normal fibroblasts (NFs) in terms of their roles in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and how do they contribute to cancer progression?
Answer from top 10 papers
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and normal fibroblasts (NFs) differ primarily in their functional roles within the tumor microenvironment (TME). While NFs are typically associated with normal tissue repair and homeostasis, CAFs are activated fibroblasts that have been educated by cancer cells to support tumor progression. CAFs promote cancer cell growth, invasion, and metastasis, and contribute to the immunosuppressive TME, which can dampen the efficacy of various therapies (Venning et al., 2020; Wright et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2013; Xing, 2010). Additionally, CAFs are characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity and plasticity, which allows them to adapt and respond to different stimuli within the TME, further influencing cancer progression (Guo et al., 2020; Wright et al., 2023; Xing, 2010).
Interestingly, normal fibroblasts can acquire the traits of CAFs when exposed to factors secreted by cancer cells, such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), which suggests a dynamic interplay between cancer cells and stromal fibroblasts (Yang et al., 2023). Moreover, CAFs are involved in the remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which not only facilitates tumor growth and metastasis but also modulates the immune system, adding complexity to their role in cancer (Mezawa & Orimo, 2021).
In summary, the distinction between CAFs and NFs in cancer lies in their functional contributions to the TME, with CAFs being key players in tumor promotion and NFs serving more traditional roles in tissue maintenance. The heterogeneity and plasticity of CAFs, along with their ability to remodel the ECM and suppress immune responses, underscore their significance in cancer progression and the potential for targeting them in therapeutic strategies (Mezawa & Orimo, 2021; Venning et al., 2020; Wright et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2013; Xing, 2010).
Source Papers