What are the costs associated with diagnosing heart failure using traditional methods?
Answer from top 10 papers
The costs associated with diagnosing heart failure using traditional methods are significant, both in terms of direct healthcare expenses and the broader economic impact. Traditional diagnostic techniques, while essential, often fail to guide clinical decisions effectively in a timely and cost-efficient manner (Li et al., 2022). The economic burden of heart failure, particularly following hospitalization and disease management, was estimated at around $18 billion in 2017 (Li et al., 2022). Moreover, the utilization of healthcare resources, including prescriptions, outpatient encounters, and hospital admissions, contributes to substantial costs post-diagnosis, especially after a worsening heart failure event (Schneider & Stojanovic, 2019).
Interestingly, while traditional methods such as echocardiography are widely used, they may have decreased diagnostic accuracy, particularly in asymptomatic patients (Singh et al., 2024). Additionally, the use of natriuretic peptides as biomarkers, despite their increased diagnostic accuracy, may also entail costs related to laboratory testing and interpretation (Matsumoto et al., 2020). Furthermore, the economic implications of heart failure diagnosis extend beyond the initial detection, as factors such as comorbid diseases can significantly increase healthcare costs (Taylor & Hobbs, 2010).
In summary, diagnosing heart failure using traditional methods incurs substantial costs, which are exacerbated by the need for ongoing management and the presence of comorbid conditions. The economic burden following a worsening heart failure event is particularly high, underscoring the need for cost-effective diagnostic approaches and preventative strategies to mitigate progression and improve patient outcomes (Schneider & Stojanovic, 2019).
Source Papers