Abstract
The application of ZIFT in the general IVF population has gradually declined worldwide over the years. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials found no difference in pregnancy and implantation rates between women undergoing ZIFT and IVF-ET {Habana and Palter; Fertil Steril 2001}. For the last ten years, the therapeutic approach at our institution has been to offer IVF with ZIFT to patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF), whenever permitted by tubal status. In previous publications, we have clearly demonstrated the superiority of ZIFT over conventional embryo transfer (ET) {Levran et al.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
More From: Fertility and Sterility
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
