Abstract
From an in-depth reading of the first lines of Santiago Rusiñol’s L’Hèroe (1903), two morphologically distinct notions of work are highlighted: “el treballar” and “treball”. With the contrastive characterization of both throughout the work, what at first glance might seem a purely formal difference proves to be a clear ideological collision: on the one hand, "el treballar" as liberation and self-realization, on the other, “treball” as suppression and exploitation. This collision not only determines the perception of space and time within the play, but is also at the heart of the dramatic conflict, thus structuring the dynamics of the whole play. Finally, comparing this dynamic with the dialectical conception of Hegel's work and Marx's counterposition, one discovers a striking parallel between these attitudes and that of Rusiñol: While Anton represents the optimistic Hegelian model, Carme and Joan play Marx’s rather pessimistic role.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.