Abstract
The study compares the preferences for conflict management of employees from different national cultures. The study of the way people from different cultures manage conflict is crucial in today’s globalised world, especially in a multicultural workforce. People from different cultures often have different goals, values and assumptions concerning many aspects of conflict interaction. These differences can create conflict situations. Individualism-collectivism appears to be the most influential factor in determining how people from different cultures manage conflict. Interpersonal styles of conflict management fall into five categories: integrating, obliging, dominating, avoiding and compromising. Studies on conflict management suggest that people from individualistic cultures tend to prefer a conflict-dominant management style, whereas people from collectivistic cultures tend to prefer obliging and avoiding conflict management styles. Finally, the paper presents models for resolving cross-cultural conflict created by M. Kozan (harmony model, confrontational model and regulative model) and by C. Clarke and D. Lipp (the seven-step conflict resolution model). The findings of this study suggest that managers should consider cultural differences in conflict management when diagnosing and intervening in conflict situations in different cultures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.