Abstract

Summary The suppression of recombination during sex‐chromosome evolution is thought to be favoured by linkage between the sex‐determining locus and sexually antagonistic loci, and leads to the degeneration of the chromosome restricted to the heterogametic sex. Despite substantial evidence for genetic degeneration at the sequence level, the phenotypic effects of the earliest stages of sex‐chromosome evolution are poorly known.Here, we compare the morphology, viability and fertility between XY and YY individuals produced by crossing seed‐producing males in the dioecious plant Mercurialis annua, which has young sex chromosomes with limited X−Y sequence divergence.We found no significant difference in viability or vegetative morphology between XY and YY males. However, electron microscopy revealed clear differences in pollen anatomy, and YY males were significantly poorer sires in competition with their XY counterparts. Our study suggests either that the X chromosome is required for full male fertility in M. annua, or that male fertility is sensitive to the dosage of relevant Y‐linked genes.We discuss the possibility that the maintenance of male‐fertility genes on the X chromosome might have been favoured in recent population expansions that selected for the ability of females to produce pollen in the absence of males.

Highlights

  • Sex chromosomes have evolved numerous times in eukaryotes, showing a number of features that are remarkably common

  • A restriction enzyme-based assay was developed based on X- and Y-specific single nucletide polymorphisms (SNPs) to distinguish between XY and YY males

  • Results from mating arrays suggested that YY males were less fertile than XY males

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sex chromosomes have evolved numerous times in eukaryotes, showing a number of features that are remarkably common. Purifying selection is much less efficient in regions of low recombination because of HillÀRobertson interference between linked loci (Hill & Robertson, 1966; McVean & Charlesworth, 2000), and processes such as genetic hitchhiking (Maynard-Smith & Haigh, 1974; Rice, 1987a), background selection (Charlesworth et al, 1995; Kaiser & Charlesworth, 2009) and Muller’s ratchet result in the accumulation of deleterious mutations (Muller, 1918; Gordo & Charlesworth, 2001; Bachtrog & Gordo, 2004; Engelst€adter, 2008) The effects of such processes on the nonrecombining region of sex chromosomes have been documented at the genomic and transcriptomic levels in a diverse range of organisms (Rice, 1996; Steinemann & Steinemann, 1998; Berlin et al, 2007; Kaiser & Charlesworth, 2010), including plants (Filatov et al, 2000; Liu et al, 2004; Hough et al, 2017). Their phenotypic effects in terms of morphology, life history, viability and fertility have received little attention beyond potentially associated patterns of sexual dimorphism

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call