Abstract
Aim: This research intended to assess the quality of information acquired from YouTube videos concerning the zygomatic implant.
 Material and Method: 'Zygomatic implant' was selected as the search term for YouTube videos. The first 200 videos were reviewed. After exceptions, the rest of them (n=57) were evaluated regarding the content's usefulness according to 8 titles by two researchers. The videos were classified as poor (0), moderate (1), and excellent (2) based on the content score. All videos were grouped according to upload sources (healthcare professionals, health companies, or others) and types (patient experience, educational, or scientifically incorrect). Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and Pearson's tests were performed for data analysis (p
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
