Abstract

There has been an increased focus on understanding youth sexual offending in recent years, but there has been limited empirical research on the causes, pathways, and treatment of youth who have sexually offended—especially within a non-Western context. The Good Lives and Self-Regulation Models have often been used to understand and rehabilitate adult sexual offenders, but (unfortunately) there is scant research on youth who sexually offended using these models. The present study aims to describe the different primary goods that are associated with youth sexual offending behaviors in an Asian context. In addition, the study sought to explore whether the age of victim (child vs. nonchild) and nature of sexual offense (penetrative vs. nonpenetrative) influenced the youth’s engagement in offense pathways. The results suggest that pleasure, relatedness, and inner peace were the primary human goods that were most sought after by a sample of 168 youth who sexually offended in Singapore. In addition, offender classification (in relation to the age of victim and nature of sexual offense) influenced the pathways to sexual offending. Therefore, these findings have important clinical implications for assessment, management, and intervention planning for youth who sexually offended.

Highlights

  • Work on understanding sexual offending has been mostly focused on adult offenders, but youth sexual offending represents an ongoing social, judicial, clinical, and policy issue for services

  • The results showed that adult sexual offenders had prioritized agency and relatedness ahead of inner peace; it should noted that the sample was small (N = 42) and the other primary goods were not examined in the study

  • Offenders following different offense pathways could be distinguished by characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Work on understanding sexual offending has been mostly focused on adult offenders, but youth sexual offending represents an ongoing social, judicial, clinical, and policy issue for services. Some examples of primary human goods include (a) community (connection to wider social groups), (b) creativity (expressing oneself through alternative forms), (c) excellence in agency (autonomy and self-directedness), (d) excellence in play (hobbies and recreational pursuits) and work (mastery experiences), (e) inner peace (freedom from emotional turmoil and stress), (f) knowledge (how well informed one feels about things that are important to them), (g) life (healthy living and functioning), (h) happiness/pleasure (the state of feeling good in the here and ), (i) relatedness (peer, romantic, and familial relationships), and (j) spirituality (in the broad sense of finding purpose and meaning in life; Ward & Gannon, 2006). The attainment of these goods is usually associated with higher levels of well-being, as well as the development of a selfidentity and purpose in life, whereas the converse is associated with psychological problems (e.g., Emmons, 1999; Ward & Stewart, 2003; Yates & Ward, 2008)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call