Youth Tackle Football Head-Impact Estimation by Players and Parents: Is the Perception the Reality?

Abstract

With growing concerns surrounding exposure to head impacts in youth tackle football, players and parents must understand the exposure level when assenting and consenting to participate. To determine whether youth football players and parents could estimate on-field head-impact frequency, severity, and location. Prospective cohort study. Football field. We administered a 10-question head-impact estimation tool to parents (n = 23; mean age = 36.5 years [95% CI = 31.7, 37.3 years]) and players (n = 16 boys; mean age = 11.1 years [95% CI = 10.3, 11.8 years]). Player on-field head-impact exposure was captured using the Triax SIM-G system. We determined the accuracy between player and parent estimates relative to on-field head-impact exposures using κ and weighted κ values. Youth tackle football players and parents did not accurately estimate on-field head-impact frequency (κ range = -0.09 to 0.40), severity (κ range = -0.05 to 0.34), or location (κ range = -0.30 to 0.13). Players and parents overestimated head-impact frequency in practices but underestimated the frequency in games. Both groups overestimated head-impact severity, particularly in games. Most players and parents underestimated the number of head impacts to the top of the head, particularly during practices. Underestimations of head-impact frequency in games and to the top of the head suggest that informed consent processes aimed at educating players and parents should be improved. Overestimations of head-impact frequency in practices and severity may explain declining rates of youth tackle football participation.