Abstract

When Spare Rib first launched in July 1972, its glossy pages promised to explore the ‘new’ politics of women's liberation through the familiar form of the magazine. From editorials exploring how it feels to work collectively to letters from readers expressing the emotional toll of discrimination, Spare Rib makes a consistent effort to provide spaces in which the feelings associated with women’s liberation can be articulated and explored. This article examines the extent to which affect theory might help to illuminate the virulent discourse of feeling in Spare Rib. Foregrounding the high premium placed on personal testimony, both within the women’s liberation movement and in Spare Rib specifically, it explores a mixed selection of published correspondence and reflective editorials in order to assess how ‘bad’ feelings, in particular, might serve as a magnet’ around which the politics of feminism can be negotiated and critiqued.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call