Abstract
IN NATURE of April 28, p. 268, Dr. R. A. Houstoun directs attention to the use of the spectrometer for Young's double-slit experiment. In a letter on “The Visibility of Interference Fringes and the Double Slit” (NATURE, July 26, 1917, vol. xcix., p. 424) the present writer made reference to a similar optical arrangement. In that letter emphasis was laid, not on the advantages of the method for observing fringes and evaluating wave-length, but on its use for studying the changes in the visibility of fringes which occur as the width of the spectrometer slit is altered. In view of Prof. Michelson's recent use of the double slit for the measurement of the angular width of distant stars, I may be pardoned for directing attention to my note of some years ago, and for pointing out the ease with which an experiment similar in method to that of Prof. Michelson may be performed by means of an ordinary spectrometer. It is true that, instead of using a source of fixed (but finite) width and a variable double slit, the converse arrangement was employed, but in principle the methods are identical. It might be worth while, however, to vary the experiment by replacing the spectrometer slit by a small circular aperture and using a double slit of variable width.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.