Abstract

Abstract Biographers and critics have often noted the late composition of Paradise Lost as remarkable, and indeed the narrator himself commented on the tragic wartime delay. The late publication of Paradise Lost raises important questions about the poet's creative process and more generally about creativity late in a poet's life. The article elaborates the question of whether Milton was an experimental or conceptual innovator, using economist David Galenson's dichotomy of the creative life cycle, posits a surprising answer, and explains the significance for other works of early modern art.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.