Abstract
When asked to find the referent of a novel label, young children usually select a novel object rather than an object that has a known label. However, children did not show this so-called disambiguation effect in a situation that required cross-modal generalization of the known label (Scofield et al., 2009). In three experiments, children learned a label for an object that they could see, but not touch, then examined two objects that they could touch, but not see. One of these tactile objects was novel, whereas the other was an exemplar of the just-trained label. On the critical trials, children were asked to decide which object was the referent of a novel label. Neither 3- nor 4-year-olds favored the novel object unless they were first asked to choose the one that was the referent of the just-trained label (both age groups) or choose the one that was the same as the visual training object (4-year-olds only). Children’s tendency to disambiguate across the senses was associated with how accurately they judged their own knowledge of object labels. These findings are consistent with the claim that the cross-modal disambiguation effect can be undermined by children’s reactions to discovering the cross-modal match and by their failure to retrieve the known label for this matching object when considering whether a novel label applies to it.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.