Abstract

Visual perception is, at any given moment, strongly influenced by its temporal context—what stimuli have recently been perceived and in what surroundings. We have previously shown that to-be-ignored items produce a bias upon subsequent perceptual decisions that acts in parallel with other biases induced by attended items. However, our previous investigations were confined to biases upon the perceived orientation of a visual search target, and it is unclear whether these biases influence perceptual decisions in a more general sense. Here, we test whether the biases from visual search targets and distractors affect the perceived orientation of a neutral test line, one that is neither a target nor a distractor. To do so, we asked participants to search for an oddly oriented line among distractors and report its location for a few trials and next presented a test line irrelevant to the search task. Participants were asked to report the orientation of the test line. Our results indicate that in tasks involving visual search, targets induce a positive bias upon a neutral test line if their orientations are similar, whereas distractors produce an attractive bias for similar test lines and a repulsive bias if the orientations of the test line and the average orientation of the distractors are far apart in feature space. In sum, our results show that both attentional role and proximity in feature space between previous and current stimuli determine the direction of biases in perceptual decisions.

Highlights

  • Our visual system needs to process a large amount of complex visual information at any given moment

  • We have previously shown that to-be-ignored items produce a bias upon subsequent perceptual decisions that acts in parallel with other biases induced by attended items

  • We studied the effect of distractors upon perceptual decisions about the attended items during visual search for an oddly oriented line among distractors (Rafiei, Hansmann-Roth, Whitney, Kristjánsson, & Chetverikov, 2021)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our visual system needs to process a large amount of complex visual information at any given moment. We know that the appearance of an object typically does not change dramatically from one moment to the This means that our visual system may ignore negligible changes in the visual input to promote stability. When objects do change, the same heuristic might lead to biases One example of this is serial dependence (e.g., Fischer & Whitney, 2014; Pascucci, Mancuso, Santandrea, Della Libera, Plomp, & Chelazzi, 2019). They found that orientation estimates for this second line were biased toward the inducer orientation They concluded that perception is tuned toward previous stimuli that have similar features and appear in the same locations and proposed that serial dependence promotes perceptual stability in the visual environment (for reviews, see Burr & Cicchini, 2014; Cicchini & Kristjánsson, 2015; Kiyonaga, Scimeca, Bliss, & Whitney, 2017). Further investigations have since revealed that the perception of many other

Objectives
Methods
Results

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.