Abstract

To be considered an Irish writer is to invite any number of expectations of identity: rural or urban, nationalist or (post-) colonialist, a Tomas O’Crohan or a Samuel Beckett. While the complexity of these expectations only adds to the vitality and richness of Irish literature, it can also add an unspoken demand on the author’s work: either to participate in the observed tradition or to stand out through a distinction of style. Critics have long attempted to codify the essence of Irish literature with varying degrees of success, and the “Irishness” of the author is ultimately used as a kind of cultural capital toward the creation of an aesthetically defined Ireland, a trend initiated by Yeats and the other Irish Renaissance cultural nationalists. As many scholars have noted, though, this particular Ireland is a feminized concept with Cathleen ni Houlihan as the most recognizable avatar. The aesthetic re-imagining of the country as a coherent and identifiable whole, furthermore, like the authors’ characteristics that shape it, reveals a desire for commodified art and artists through which “Irishness” is negotiated. Within this context, it is no surprise that Mary Lavin’s fiction plays such a complicated and understated role. In a field dominated by male authors and capitalist demands, Lavin’s writing engages the gendered expectations underlying this translation of art into capital. One of her earliest stories, “A Story with a Pattern,” a response to Lord Dunsany’s suggestion that her fiction show more of a “well-defined plot,” presents a female author faced with the demand of a reader for stories that have discernable plots and tidy endings. The critic’s clear equation of a sense of plot with masculine writing places the narrator in the uncomfortable position of being unable to justify her participation in the literary world

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call