Abstract
Against the expectations of double minority researchers, Carol Moseley‐Braun convinced a majority of senators to vote against an amendment for a design patent featuring the confederate flag. By effectively managing her rhetorical status, she turned sex, gender, and support for a minority viewpoint—the very qualities that Helms emphasized as detractors from Moseley‐Braun's credibility in the Senate—into qualities that contributed to her credibility. In turn, increased credibility led to enhanced rhetorical status, which intervened to affect positively the efficacy of her arguments. Enactment and inspirational appeals are identified as the two rhetorical tools she used to prevail.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.