Abstract

ContextLow temperature during the critical period of wheat can cause floret sterility, grain abortion, yield reduction, and economic losses. ObjectiveWe tested the hypothesis that selection for yield improved frost tolerance. MethodWe measured phenology, yield and its components, including the distribution of grains within the spike, in a factorial experiment combining 12 wheat varieties released from 1973 to 2015, two sowing dates (mid-April and early or mid-May), two thermal regimes, ambient control and frost-protected, and two seasons. To protect crops from frost we used moveable, lightweight passive heating chambers before each frost event (≤ 0 °C). ResultsThe rate of genetic gain in yield aligned with frost severity: it ranged from negligible under severe frost to 0.79 ± 0.05% y−1 in unfrosted crops. The chambers diminished but did not fully prevent frost; across sources of variation grain yield was 179 ± 20.1 g m−2 in ambient control and 264 ± 13.3 g m−2 in frost-protected treatments. Frost intensity was calculated as the cumulative, canopy-level minimum temperature below 2 °C during the period from −300 to + 100 °C d centred at anthesis. For the pooled data, yield declined with frost intensity at 1.24 ± 0.12% °C−1. Across varieties and environments, frost-protected crops set 29 ± 3.0 grains spike−1 compared with 19 ± 2.7 in ambient control. We did not find random grain abortion within spikelets, but random sterile spikelets. Average grain weight (weighed by the relative contributions of these grains to the number of grains per spike) in main shoot spike did not vary with thermal regime. ConclusionsSelection for yield did not improve frost tolerance. Preventing spring radiation frost improved spike fertility by increasing the proportion of grains in distal positions with no reduction in grain weight potential within spikelets in relation to controls. ImplicationsWe advanced damage functions relating yield and frost, which are useful for modelling, and maps of grain set in spikes that help understanding the physiology of yield in response to frost.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call