Abstract

We discuss a rather common but often unnoticed pitfall which arises when deriving the bounded-from-below (BFB) conditions in multi-Higgs models with softly broken global symmetries. Namely, necessary and sufficient BFB conditions derived for the case with an exact symmetry can be ruined by introducing soft symmetry breaking terms. Using S4 and A4-symmetric three-Higgs-doublet models as an example, we argue that all published necessary and sufficient BFB conditions, even those which are correct for the exactly symmetric case, are no longer sufficient if soft symmetry breaking is added. Using the geometric formalism, we derive the exact necessary and sufficient BFB conditions for the 3HDM with the symmetry group S4, either exact or softly broken, and review the situation for the A4-symmetric case.

Highlights

  • Theoretical search for New Physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) is driven, in the absence of direct experimental indications, by “educated guesses”

  • Using S4 and A4-symmetric three-Higgs-doublet models as an example, we argue that all published necessary and sufficient BFB conditions, even those which are correct for the exactly symmetric case, are no longer sufficient if soft symmetry breaking is added

  • The quadratic part of this model is extremely simple due to the group-theoretic arguments: if all Higgs doublets transform as an irreducible representation of the chosen symmetry group, one can construct only one quadratic group invariant respecting gauge symmetries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Theoretical search for New Physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) is driven, in the absence of direct experimental indications, by “educated guesses”. There is strong evidence that in the absence of New Physics all the way up to the Planck scale, the Standard Model effective Higgs potential goes deeper than the electroweak vacuum around the scale of Λ ∼ 1010 GeV [16], either developing a second, deeper minimum at transplanckian scales or even remaining unbounded from below. Such cases are still based on tree level potentials which are completely stable; metastability occurs at higher values of the scalar fields in effective potentials. Several appendices provide details of the calculations in support of statements made in the main text

Two parametrizations
The literature on the BFB conditions in A4 3HDM
A quick check for the rephasing invariant model
Geometric treatment of the rephasing invariant model
Is checking neutral minima enough?
The case with an exact S4 symmetry
Softly broken S4
The A4-symmetric case
Conclusions
A The bilinear formalism in 3HDM
B The BFB conditions for the rephasing invariant model: direct calculations
Flat directions
Circumscribed polyhedron
Formulation of the problem
The main solution
The “trivial” solution

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.