Abstract

The clinical and biological significance of the newly described SCLC subtypes, SCLC-A, SCLC-N, SCLC-Y, and SCLC-P, defined by the dominant expression of transcription factors ASCL1, NeuroD1, YAP1, and POU2F3, respectively, remain to be established. We generated new RNA sequencing expression data from a discovery set of 59 archival tumor samples of neuroendocrine tumors and new protein expression data by immunohistochemistry in 99 SCLC cases. We validated the findings from this discovery set in two independent validation sets consisting of RNA sequencing data generated from 51 SCLC cell lines and 81 primary human SCLC samples. We successfully classified 71.8% of SCLC and 18.5% of carcinoid cases in our discovery set into one of the four SCLC subtypes. Gene set enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes between the SCLC survival outliers (top and bottom deciles) matched for clinically relevant prognostic factors revealed substantial up-regulation of interferon-γ response genes in long-term survivors. The SCLC-Y subtype was associated with high expression of interferon-γ response genes, highest weighted score on a validated 18-gene T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile score, and high expression of HLA and T-cell receptor genes. YAP1 protein expression was more prevalent and more intensely expressed in limited-stage versus extensive-stage SCLC (30.6% versus 8.5%; p= 0.0058) indicating good prognosis for the SCLC-Y subtype. We replicated the inflamed phenotype of SCLC-Y in the two independent validation data sets from the SCLC cell lines and tumor samples. SCLC subtyping using transcriptional signaling holds clinical relevance with the inflamed phenotype associated with the SCLC-Y subset.

Highlights

  • The clinical and biological significance of the newly described SCLC subtypes, SCLC-A, SCLC-N, SCLC-Y, and SCLC-P, defined by the dominant expression of transcription factors ASCL1, NeuroD1, YAP1, and POU2F3, respectively, remain to be established

  • Chemotherapy remains the key backbone of treating this disease with more than 60% of patients with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) responding to frontline cytotoxic chemotherapy, yet 5-year survival remains under 10%

  • Patient and Sample Selection We interrogated our institutional database of patients with SCLC under an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol to identify patients with SCLC who were survival outliers, defined as patients in the top and bottom deciles of overall survival (OS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The clinical and biological significance of the newly described SCLC subtypes, SCLC-A, SCLC-N, SCLC-Y, and SCLC-P, defined by the dominant expression of transcription factors ASCL1, NeuroD1, YAP1, and POU2F3, respectively, remain to be established. Outcomesfor SCLC remain poor, in part because of limited understanding of both the biology of the disease and the key determinants of response to treatment. The benefit of this new treatment paradigm is limited to a small subset of patients.[1,2,3,4] Chemotherapy remains the key backbone of treating this disease with more than 60% of patients with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) responding to frontline cytotoxic chemotherapy, yet 5-year survival remains under 10%. Approximately 30% of patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy still progress and die within a few months of treatment. The biological underpinning of the widely different outcomes for early and late survivors despite their treatment with the same platinum doublet chemotherapy has not been well explored

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call