Abstract

The article discusses the work of Boris Valentinovich Yakovenko, one of the most prominent representatives of Russian neo-Kantianism. The philosophy of Yakovenko is analyzed in the context of the German and Russian philosophical traditions of the early twentieth century - phenomenology and neo-Kantianism. Being a supporter of neo-Kantianism, Yakovenko devoted most of his research to questions of cognition . The article examines the foundations of criticism, directed by Yakovenko against modern gnosiological approaches. The unacceptability of these approaches consists in mixing different types of being by Yakovenko. Yakovenko believes that Husserl's phenomenology focuses on the study of the process of psychological cognition, and it is impossible based on subjectivity to achieve objective knowledge. Cohen, in the opinion of Yakovenko, denying the possibility of a pure givenness of sensations, relativizes the very idea of existence, implying only science under it. Yakovenko calls his own ontological attitude transcendental pluralism. Transcendental pluralism recognizes the self-sufficiency and independence of each kind of Being, between which there is no connection. The cognition of this plurality of identities must be non-presumability and absolute and is possible, according to Yakovenko, in a special kind of intuition. This intuition Yakovenko called mystical, however, does not give its detailed description and justification. Nevertheless, an appeal to his philosophy allows us to actualize theoretical-cognitive problems that are of interest to us today: the problem of subjectivity and objectivity, the problem of non-presumability of knowledge, “pure givenness”, transcendence and immanence, the ratio of various types of intuitions in cognition, etc.

Highlights

  • The article discusses the work of Boris Valentinovich Yakovenko, one of the most prominent representatives of Russian neo-Kantianism

  • The philosophy of Yakovenko is analyzed in the context of the German and Russian philosophical traditions of the early twentieth century — phenomenology and neo-Kantianism

  • Being a supporter of neo-Kantianism, Yakovenko devoted most of his research to questions of cognition

Read more

Summary

История европейской философии History of Western Philosophy

Трансцендентализм Яковенко в философском контексте его времени: феноменология и/или неокантианство[1]. Философия Яковенко анализируется в контексте немецкой и русской философских традиций начала ХХ в. В статье исследуются основания критики, направленной Яковенко против современных ему гносеологических подходов, прежде всего, против феноменологии и неокантианства. Трансцендентализм Яковенко в философском контексте его времени: феноменология и/или неокантианство // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. В работах Поппера, Куна, Лакатоса, в реалистическом направлении философии науки широко дискутировалась в немецкой трансцендентальной философской традиции начала ХХ в., прежде всего, среди представителей основных течений того времени — феноменологии и неокантианства. В статье на примере философии Бориса Валентиновича Яковенко будут рассмотрены проблемы, стоящие перед представителями неокантианства и феноменологии в области методологии познания и тесно связанные с ними онтологические вопросы. В данной статье я буду в основном ориентироваться на тексты Яковенко, собранные Ермичевым в сборнике «Мощь философии» [28]

Был ли Яковенко неокантианцем?
Основания философии Яковенко в контексте его времени
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call