Abstract
Previous studies regarding the association between X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln polymorphism and oral cancer risk were contradictory. We performed a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the association. The PubMed and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies. Odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CIs) was used to assess the strength of the association. Nine individual studies with a total of 3,244 subjects were finally included into the meta-analysis. Overall, there was no association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and oral cancer risk under all genetic models (Gln versus Arg: OR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.86-1.37, P = 0.46; GlnGln versus ArgArg: OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.69-1.79, P = 0.66; GlnGln versus ArgArg/ArgGln: OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.68-1.61, P = 0.84; and GlnGln/ArgGln versus ArgArg: OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.44, P = 0.34). After excluding studies on oral leukoplakia, there was still no association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and oral cancer risk under all genetic models. Subgroup analysis by ethnicity suggested that there was no association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and oral cancer risk in both Asians and Caucasians. In conclusion, the data from the meta-analysis suggests that XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is not associated with oral cancer risk.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
