Abstract
According to Diogenes Laertius’ Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Xenophanes of Colophon, poet and philosopher of the 6th–5th centuries BC, was sold into slavery by the Pythagoreans Parmeniscus and Orestades (D.L. IX, 20 = 21 A 1 DK). This testimony has long been a source of concern to Hellenists, taking into account the high reputation that Pythagoras and his school gained in the history of European culture and philosophy. The paper provides a critical review of all the proposed corrections to the fragment in question. In the first part it considers conjectures and emendations made by the editors and translators Diogenes Laertius’ text since the Renaissance. Particular attention is paid to Ambrogio Traversari (1386–1439), the first translator of the Vitae philosophorum, whose translation already reveals a reluctance to follow the literal meaning of the testimony. The second part of the paper examines the restoration of the text proposed by Hermann Diels, which is still the most influential. The third part discusses the position of some modern scholars who, while refusing to correct the text of Diogenes Laertius, continue to suspect him to be mistaken. As a result, the paper shows that all corrections of Diogenes’ testimony, according to which Xenophanes was sold into slavery by the Pythagoreans, are vulnerable to criticism, and that consequently its literal reading may be correct.
Highlights
Particular attention is paid to Ambrogio Traversari (1386–1439), the first translator of the Vitae philosophorum, whose translation already reveals a reluctance to follow the literal meaning of the testimony
The paper shows that all corrections of Diogenes’ testimony, according to which Xenophanes was sold into slavery by the Pythagoreans, are vulnerable to criticism, and that its literal reading may be correct
VIII, 8), а также Пилео де Марини, архиепископ Генуи, посетивший Флоренцию в 1423 г. и сблизившийся с некоторыми тамошними гуманистами
Summary
Диоген Лаэртий завершает биографию Ксенофана следующими двумя свидетельствами (D.L. IX, 20 = 21 A 1 DK): φησὶ δὲ Δημήτριοὁ Φαληρεὺἐν τῶι Περὶ γήρωκαὶ Παναίτιοὁ Στωικὸἐν τῶι Περὶ εὐθυμίαταῖἰδίαιχερσὶ θάψαι τοὺυἱεῖαὐτόν [sc. Получалось, что пифагорейцы всего-навсего похоронили Ксенофана, как сам Ксенофан и Анаксагор похоронили своих сыновей.[23] Насколько удачным оказалось исправление фон Фрица показывает хотя бы то, что Марио Унтерстейнер принял его в текст Диогена Лаэртия.[24]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.