Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs), capable of self-renew and differentiate into neural cells, hold promise for use in studies and treatments for neurological diseases. However, current approaches to obtain NSCs from a live brain are risky and invasive, since NSCs reside in the subventricular zone and the in the hippocampus dentate gyrus. Alternatively, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could be a more available cell source due to their abundance in tissues and easier to access. However, MSCs are committed to producing mesenchymal tissue and are not capable of spontaneously differentiating into neural cells. Thus, the process of reprogramming of MSCs into neural cells to use in clinical and scientific settings has significantly impacted the advancement of regenerative medicine. Previously, our laboratory reported trans-differentiation of MSCs to neural cells through the induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells state, which was produced by overexpression of the embryonic stem cell gene NANOG. In the current study, we demonstrate that treatment with exosomes derived from NSCs makes MSCs capable of expressing neural cell markers bypassing the generation of iPS cells. An epigenetic modifier, decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine), enhanced the process. This novel Xeno and transgene-free trans-differentiation technology eliminates the issues associated with iPS cells, such as tumorigenesis. Thus, it may accelerate the development of neurodegenerative therapies and in vitro neurological disorder models for personalized medicine.

Highlights

  • Neural stem cells (NSCs) residing in the subventricular zone and granule layer of the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus

  • We compared the transdifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with the following four different exosome treatments under TGF-β inhibition: Method 1; NSCs derived exosomes treatment alone, Method 2; NSCs derived exosomes treatment in the presence of 10μM decitabine, Method 3; treatment with exosomes derived from both NSCs and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, Method 4; treatment with exosomes derived from both NSCs and iPS cells in the presence of 10μM decitabine

  • There is no significant difference between Method 1 and 3, meaning that iPS cells derived exosome treatment did not affect the transdifferentiation of MSCs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neural stem cells (NSCs) residing in the subventricular zone and granule layer of the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. A similar outcome was later achieved by Yamanaka’s group who created induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from fibroblasts through the overexpression of OCT3/4, SOX2, and other tumor genes [4]. These iPS cells are an unlimited source of autologous cells that can produce any tissue without any ethical concerns or immunological rejection problems associated with ES cells. Many researchers attempted to create iPS cells in a safer and faster manner through various methods [5,6,7,8,9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.