Abstract

Objectives:This tissue microarray (TMA) immunohistochemical (IHC) study elucidates the role of Wilms’ tumor 1 protein (WT1) in diagnosis and prognostication of astrocytic tumors. Methods:IHC was applied to 75 astrocytic lesions (18 astrogliosis and 57 astrocytic tumors) using antibodies directed against WT1 clone 6F-H2, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1(IDH1), Bcl2 and Ki67. WT1 IHC staining was evaluated and scored blindly by 2 pathologists. Bcl2 and Ki67 scores and labelling indices were assessed and IDH1 status determined. Statistical analysis was performed using the appropriate methodology. Results:WT1 cytoplasmic expression was detected in 89.5% of astrocytic tumors but not in astrogliosis. Positive WT1 differentiated astrocytic tumors (92.6% accuracy) and grade II diffuse astrocytomas (93.5% accuracy) from astrogliosis with high sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values (p<0.001). Increased WT1 score significantly associated higher Bcl2 and Ki67 labelling indices, increasing WHO tumor grade and tumor’s histopathologic type (p<0.05) showing staining pattern variability by tumor entity and cell type. Glioblastomas, gliosarcomas and subependymal giant cell astrocytomas were the most frequently WT1 expressing tumors with frequent +3 WT1 score. About 21.4% of pilocytic astrocytomas had +3WT1 score in association with increased Bcl2 and Ki67 indices. Low WT1 scores in grade II and III diffuse astrocytomas were linked to the high frequency of IDH1 positivity, and were associated with low Bcl2 and Ki67 labelling indices. In glioblastomas, WT1 significantly associated poor prognostic variables: older age, negative-IDH1 status, high Bcl2 and Ki67 labelling indices (p=0.04, <0.001, =0.001 and <0.001 respectively). Conclusions:WT1 clone 6F-H2 is a highly accurate positive surrogate marker to differentiate astrocytic tumors notably the challenging grade II diffuse astrocytoma from astrogliosis. It significantly associates with poor prognostic variables including IDH1 negativity, high apoptotic and proliferative indices and depends on tumor’s histopathologic entity more than its grade. Evaluation of WT1 expression seems essential to tailor patient’s therapy.

Highlights

  • A major dilemma in routine practice of surgical neuropathology is to differentiate between reactive astrogliosis and astrocytic tumors low-grade diffuse astrocytomas (Rivera-Zengotita and Yachnis, 2012; Manocha and Jain, 2019)

  • IHC was applied to 75 astrocytic lesions (18 astrogliosis and 57 astrocytic tumors) using antibodies directed against Wilms’ tumor 1 protein (WT1) clone 6F-H2, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1(IDH1), Bcl2 and Ki67

  • Using IHC, this study investigates the accuracy of WT1 to differentiate reactive astrogliosis from astrocytic tumors and to characterize different grades and histopathologic types of astrocytic tumors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A major dilemma in routine practice of surgical neuropathology is to differentiate between reactive astrogliosis and astrocytic tumors low-grade diffuse astrocytomas (Rivera-Zengotita and Yachnis, 2012; Manocha and Jain, 2019). Considering the marked differences in prognosis and therapy, this can be principally challenging with small biopsies that often yield limited amounts of tissue for pathologic study and lack the diagnostic evidences of increased cellularity, mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation or necrosis (Bourne et al, 2010; Rivera-Zengotita and Yachnis, 2012). To serve for this target, new diagnostic methods have been proposed (Kijima et al, 2016; Manocha and Jain, 2019). Other studies indicated that WT1 is not a reliable marker to distinguish reactive from neoplastic astrocytes as it is expressed in both (Bourne et al, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call