Wrong Definition and Wrong Implications of Cosmic Red Shift (Correction and Possible Solutions)

Abstract

Since 1912, cosmologists strongly believe in the currently accepted definition of cosmic red shift as - ratio of increase in wavelength to the laboratory wavelength of photon. We would like to emphasize the point that, this definition is absolutely wrong with reference to photon energy. Clearly speaking, true cosmic red shift must be defined as the ratio of loss in energy of photon to the energy of photon at laboratory. In terms of wavelength, photon red shift must be defined as the ratio of increase in wavelength to the observed wavelength of photon. We have published this definition in our recent publications and sincerely appeal the science community and cosmologists to review the basics of Lambda cosmology, cosmic acceleration and dark energy in an unbiased approach. Regarding Tolman Surface Brightness test, we sincerely appeal the cosmologists to review and reanalyze the observations and calculations as per the corrected cosmic redshift definition with reference to cosmic expansion and cosmic rotation. Here we would like to emphasize the point that, (1+z) should be replaced by (1+znew). Upper limit of (1+znew) is 2 and upper limit of (1+znew)4 is 16