Abstract
Scientific publishing has seen many changes in its ~350 years of existence. Nonetheless, the changes currently underway may be among the most radical. The five major biogeography journals (Diversity and Distributions, Ecography, Frontiers of Biogeography, Global Ecology and Biogeography, and Journal of Biogeography) are indicative of the major undercurrents in publishing today: two are society owned, three are owned by a private publisher; two are open access, three are reader-pays; four are published by a for‐profit publisher, one is not; three are double-blind review, two are the traditional single blind. Despite these differences, we serve as editors-in-chief for these journals for one common reason: to make sure there is a healthy publishing ecosystem available to communicate biogeographical research. With that goal in mind, here, we provide a brief potted history of scientific publishing to contextualize the modern publishing environment. We consider what current trends may mean for the future of scientific publishing. And we highlight a suite of factors that we recommend be considered when choosing a venue in which to publish your research. We particularly wish to emphasize one point: while editors-in-chief may guide journals, and editors and reviewers shape the science that is published, all journals depend ultimately on the manuscripts that authors choose to submit. For this reason, authors have great power over the future of the publishing landscape. To ensure a healthy landscape, we feel it is critical that all authors—but especially we senior and mid-career authors—are educated about today’s complex world of publication and make informed choices about where to submit, which signals to publishers the criteria that our community values. Authors’ choices now have potential to shape a sustainable publishing environment that better serves current and future generations of biogeographers.
Highlights
Title Writing the future of biogeographyPowered by the California Digital Library University of California a e-ISSN: 1948-6596 https://escholarship.org/uc/fb
Scientific publishing has seen many changes in its ~350 years of existence
With that goal in mind, here, we provide a brief potted history of scientific publishing to contextualize the modern publishing environment
Summary
Powered by the California Digital Library University of California a e-ISSN: 1948-6596 https://escholarship.org/uc/fb. In the 1960s privately held, for-profit companies began entering academic publishing from other publishing fields (Edwards and Shulenburger 2003) They took over the mundane management of publication details from the societies and as the firms gained experience, they began to found their own journals as well, including three biogeography journals (Journal of Biogeography in 1974, Global Ecology and Biogeography in 1991, and Diversity and Distributions in 1993 [as Biodiversity Letters]). The work of typesetting could be pushed back onto the authors, who have to submit electronic copies of their text and figures This all meant that publishing could happen faster and cheaper, but it led to requirements for large up-front investments and economies of scale.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
