Abstract

This article adopts Ernesto Laclau’s notion of empty signifier to discuss Tang Junyi’s uses of the concept of lixing (‘reason’ or ‘rationality’) in his seminal work Cultural Consciousness and Moral Reason (文化意識與道德理性; 1958). My dual goal, in doing so, is to bring to light the relations of power constitutive of the text’s discourse on lixing and relate them to the problematic of writing philosophy from the periphery. I argue that in this work, lixing’s dual referents—as a translation of ‘reason’ and as denoting a Neo-Confucian faculty to intuit moral truths—allow Tang to inscribe himself in a philosophical field designed to exclude non-Western philosophies, while at the same time enabling him to symbolically relegate Euro-American philosophy to a peripheral position by filling in the notion of lixing with a content that legitimizes his own agenda. Tang could thus authorize his Confucian metaphysics by presenting it as the true content of lixing, understood not only as a universal faculty enabling humanity’s access to all that is universal, but also as a condition sine qua non of for one’s inclusion in the philosophical game. By attempting to co-opt the empty signifier (lixing/reason) for his own purposes, I argue Tang employs one of two possible strategies that can be adopted by those situated at the periphery in order to oppose the hegemon; one that leaves the structure of power relations intact but working in favor of the periphery.

Highlights

  • This article adopts Ernesto Laclau’s notion of empty signifier to discuss Tang Junyi’s uses of the concept of lixing (‘reason’ or ‘rationality’) in his seminal work Cultural Consciousness and Moral Reason (文化意識與道德理性; 1958)

  • I wish to point out how Tang on the one hand reproduces, in his understanding of lixing, the structural role played by rationality in Euro-American philosophy—that of providing its bearer with autonomy and universality—while on the other hand redefining in a Neo-Confucian manner the functioning of lixing as an intuitive grasp of a metaphysical source of morality

  • Compared to other empty signifiers, such as the notion of peace discussed above, lixing is unique in that it is a foundational empty signifier: it serves as the basis upon which a whole edifice of universalized particulars can be established, while at the same time authorizing one’s inclusion in the philosophical game

Read more

Summary

I borrow the expression “philosophical game” from Bourdieu 2000

Tang’s conceptualization of lixing presents itself as an overturning of Enlightenment rationality, insofar as it rests on a nonrational intuition, it serves purposes that are both similar to and diverging from Enlightenment rationality This is precisely how empty signifiers work: in order to coopt the signifier for their own purposes, those outside the hegemonic centers of power must retain and approve of the (hegemonized) linguistic system within which the empty signifier is inscribed and which provides it with authority (in Tang’s case: lixing-as-rationality as the source of human transcendence, self-determination, and freedom), but fill it with particular content in a way that is meant to universalize their particular perspective (in Tang’s case: lixing-as-liangzhi, understood as an intuitive grasp of moral truth).

32 Tang 1974b
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.