Abstract
Although the Book of Esther is well known in Jewish tradition for its inauguration of the popular festival of Purim, it is a marginal book in Christian tradition because of the interpretative difficulties it presents to its readers. The story itself pre-empts such problems of reading and interpretation: an irreversible edict ordering the annihilation of the Jews is apparently overturned, and the reading of forgotten chronicles reverses the protagonists' destinies. This essay considers those moments when the biblical book is invoked for what it says about writing, with special focus on the literary borrowings of Robert Browning in The Ring and the Book (1868) and Jacques Derrida in 'Envois' (1987). These authors' reflections on the complications of reading and suspicions about the destiny of writing not only pre-empt Esther's own colourful and varied reception history, but offer a challenge to triumphalist interpretation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
