Abstract
The study analyzes the provisions of the Law on Advocates, which condition the entry into the list of advcates of persons who practice the profession of a judicial officer and the grounds for the decision on the deletion of these persons from the list of advocates. The current regulation in this area shows inconsistency with other, similar provisions limiting entries on the lists of persons performing other legal professions of public trust. In addition, it also shows internal incoherence, obliging on the one hand to enter the judicial officer who performs his profession on the list of advocates, and after making the entry, obliging the Bar associations to strike this person off the list. In the summary of the study, de lege ferenda conclusions have been formulated, the implementation of which will allow to eliminate the drawbacks of the currently binding legal regulations in this respect.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
