Abstract

Since its first use as a bone void filler at the end of the 19th century, calcium sulphate products have been adapted in different ways to aid orthopaedic surgeons. Calcium sulphate local antibiotic delivery systems offer a promising solution in the delivery of high antibiotic concentrations locally for an extended period of time. Over the years, multiple centres have reported side effects such as wound drainage, heterotrophic ossification and hypercalcaemia. This study was carried out to assess the risk of wound drainage in prosthetic joints after implantation of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulphate beads. Two reviewers searched the literature in three online databases using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. The search of databases yielded 182 articles. The studies without reported post-operative complications, mainly drainage outcomes, were excluded. After screening, seven articles were deemed suitable and selected. Out of the 1,112 cases identified, 43 joints developed wound drainage after calcium sulphate bead placement. This complication was resolved in all these cases by either conservative or operative approaches. The factors implicated in the development of wound drainage include the volume of the product used, procedural placement and host factors. The result of this systematic review shows that calcium sulphate products can be used for treatment and prophylaxis in prosthetic joints with a risk of post-procedural wound drainage. This risk, however, is lesser with the use of synthetic calcium sulphate products as compared with conventional calcium sulphate products.

Highlights

  • BackgroundIn England and Wales, there are about 160,000 joint replacements performed in a year [1]

  • They have been found to be effective in treating prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as the beads are completely absorbed from the joint space and do not need to be surgically removed

  • Across seven studies, we identified 1,112 patients who underwent prosthetic joint surgeries for various aseptic and septic indications (Table 2) with calcium sulphate bead implantation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In England and Wales, there are about 160,000 joint replacements performed in a year [1]. Surgeons have been increasingly using calcium sulphate beads to deliver antibiotics to the joint space. Calcium sulphate beads are traditionally used as bone filling agents [6] They have been found to be effective in treating PJI as the beads are completely absorbed from the joint space and do not need to be surgically removed. Wound drainage has been associated with higher volumes of calcium sulphate beads, volumes greater than 20 cc [11]. The aim of this study is to determine the risk of developing wound drainage when using calcium sulphate beads in any prosthetic joint surgery. How to cite this article Tarar M, Khalid A, Usman M, et al (November 16, 2021) Wound Leakage With the Use of Calcium Sulphate Beads in Prosthetic Joint Surgeries: A Systematic Review.

Methodology
Discussion
Study Method
Conclusions
Findings
Disclosures
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call