Abstract
We review a selection of models for wormlike micelles undergoing reptation and chain sequence rearrangement (e.g. reversible scission) and show that many different assumptions and approximations all produce similar predictions for linear rheology. Therefore, the inverse problem of extracting quantitative microscopic information from linear rheology data alone may be ill-posed without additional supporting data to specify the sequence rearrangement pathway. At the same time, qualitative parameter estimates can be obtained equally well from any of the models in question. Our study also provides a careful re-assessment of how to best reconcile artificial chain sequence rearrangement pathways (such as Poisson renewal) with physical processes like reversible scission.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.