Worldwide and Regional Efficacy Estimates of First-line Helicobacter pylori Treatments: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection is challenging. We aimed to determine the optimal first-line H. pylori treatments at global and regional levels. We searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ISRCTN registry, for randomized controlled trials published during 2011-2020. Utilizing a network meta-analysis in a Bayesian framework, success rates of 23 regimens were compared. The effect size was standardized risk ratio (RR) with 95% credible interval (CrI). Pooled eradication rate (ER) with 95% CrI was also reported for top combinations. The reference regimen was 7-day clarithromycin-based triple therapy. This review identified 121 trials comprising 34,759 participants. Globally, 14-day levofloxacin-based sequential therapy was the most efficient (RR: 1.43; 95% CrI, 1.26-1.59) with low certainty of evidence, followed by modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (proton pump inhibitor+bismuth compounds+clarithromycin+amoxicillin) for 10 days (RR: 1.35; 95% CrI, 1.22-1.48) and 14 days (RR: 1.27; 95% CrI, 1.12-1.42), and 14-day hybrid therapy (RR: 1.27; 95% CrI, 1.19-1.36). The corresponding ERs were 98.7% (95% CrI, 86.9-100.0), 93.2% (95% CrI, 84.2-100.0), 87.6% (95% CrI, 82.1-93.8), and 87.6% (95% CrI, 77.3-98.0), respectively. Continentally, the most effective combinations were: 10-day clarithromycin-based sequential therapy [(RR: 1.21; 95% CrI, 1.02-1.42), (ER: 89.5%, 95% CrI, 75.5-100.0)] for Africa, 14-day levofloxacin-based sequential therapy [(RR: 1.41; 95%CrI, 1.27-1.58), (ER: 98.7%, 95% CrI, 88.9-100.0)] for Asia, and 14-day clarithromycin-based triple therapy [(RR: 1.58; 95% CrI, 1.25-2.04), (ER: 94.8%; 95% CrI, 75.0-100.0)] for Europe. For Northern America, no sufficient data were found for network meta-analysis. In South America, none of the combinations were superior to the reference regimen. Although results of this network meta-analysis revealed optimal combinations for empiric therapy, the treatment preference would be based on the local pattern of antibacterial resistance, when the necessary information exists.