Abstract

PurposeGamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanings, and motives in a pre-donation setting.MethodsAn electronic survey (n = 555 students) was used in this anonymous observational study. To enable comparisons between men and women regarding their attitudes, meanings, and motives and their willingness to donate gametes, we designed two separate questionnaires.ResultsThe sample was divided into three groups based on the willingness to donate: potential donors (n = 133; women: 48.1%, men: 51.9%); doubtful donors (n = 207; women: 75.8%, men: 24.2%); and non-donors (n = 215; women: 68.3%, men: 31.7%). The group of potential male donors (39.2%) was significantly larger than the group of potential female donors (16.9%). Significant differences regarding altruism, the meaning of one’s self-worth, and passing on the own genes were found between doubtful and potential donors. Potential donors attached less value to altruism but more value to the enhancement of one’s self-worth and passing on one’s genes than doubtful donors. The motive of passing on one’s genes and altruistic motives were more important to men than to women.ConclusionThis study helps to create a better understanding of potential donors in the existing donation framework and supports the evaluation of the given regimes in the context of designing an improved framework.

Highlights

  • Reproductive medicine is a dynamic field of medical science and is influenced by societal and political changes

  • Our study reveals that doubtful donors differ significantly from potential donors in the role that altruism, passing on one’s genes, and enhancing one’s self-esteem play with respect to the willingness to donate

  • Our results show that altruism and the motive of passing on one’s genes seem more relevant to men than to women

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reproductive medicine is a dynamic field of medical science and is influenced by societal and political changes. Legal regulations on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have not yet been harmonized within Europe. The scope of the existing regulations varies, does not reflect a certain standard, and can be summarized as a legal mosaic [1].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call