Workshop (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1972517

Abstract

Background/Objectives Teams with diverse perspectives and experiences have been increasingly recognized for their ability to identify key issues and utilize creativity and problem solving to plan and implement research and clinical initiatives that lead to greater impact. Yet, often we are unsure how to best engage individuals with differing expertise, such as those with lived experience, clinicians, healthcare administrators, engineers, researchers, funders and policy experts. After completing this workshop, participants will be able to: 1) Understand the principles and value of meaningfully engaging with a diverse team when conducting research or clinical projects, 2) Identify strategies that can facilitate the meaningful engagement of individuals with differing expertise, and 3) Create a plan of engagement for a research study or clinical initiative. Methods/Overview A combination of lecture-based and case-based learning will be used to explain the guiding principles and best-practices for meaningful engagement and to discuss relevant resources, such as the North American Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Consortium’s SCI Resource Advocacy Course and the Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles. Participants will be asked to apply these principles and practices to one of their own research or clinical initiatives through small group discussion. The Canadian Activity-Based Therapy (ABT) Community of Practice, which brings together diverse groups to address priorities for ABT research and clinical care, will be used as a case example during large group discussion. Results Not applicable. Conclusions Through this workshop, participants will gain knowledge and strategies that can be applied to facilitate meaningful engagement in research and clinical initiatives.