Abstract

This case-study conducted in Norway investigates employers’ responses to policy measures implemented throughout 2006–2015 and aimed at promoting the inclusion of persons with disabilities (PwDs) into mainstream employment by providing workplace adaptations. For this purpose, we apply a multi-method approach by combining in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with the managers at two large private companies in Norway and quantitative shift-share analysis performed on the Norwegian Disabled People LFS data. While the shift-share analysis has demonstrated positive effects in the employment of PwDs at the national level and in providing adaptations at work during 2011–2015 for ‘changes of working time’, ‘need for one or more adaptations’ and ‘changes of work tasks’, ‘physical adaptations’ remain negative. The qualitative interviews report that ‘flexibility’ or ‘changes of working time’ is the main workplace adaptation the managers at both companies provide to own employees who return to work after acquiring a disability or having a long-term illness. Both companies demonstrate high conformity to accessibility standards, however, the provision of workplace adaptations to PwDs without prior work experience remains limited or absent despite the disability policy measures in Norway in that period and the companies’ commitment to inclusion.

Highlights

  • Persons with disabilities (PwDs) have long been excluded from mainstream employment due to multiple discriminatory barriers (Hogan, Kyaw-Myint, Harris, & Denronden, 2012; Vornholt, Uitdewilligen, & Nijhuis, 2013)

  • The results of the qualitative interviews demonstrate the experiences of the responsible managers at two large companies in Norway with ensuring the inclusion of PwDs in mainstream employment, providing adaptations at work, as well as their awareness of the evolving disability policy measures

  • Our company is not a kindergarten [that has] to arrange the work tasks for these people. (Department manager/Supervisor, C2). These findings show the importance of the managers and supervisors’ attitudes towards PwDs and how this affects their handling of accommodation requests, which is in line with the findings of Hogan et al (2012), and and Schur et al (2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Persons with disabilities (PwDs) have long been excluded from mainstream employment due to multiple discriminatory barriers (Hogan, Kyaw-Myint, Harris, & Denronden, 2012; Vornholt, Uitdewilligen, & Nijhuis, 2013). Social Inclusion, 2018, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 34–45 tive (Council Directive 2000/78/EC, 2000) and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) impose on employers the duty to provide ‘reasonable accommodation’ or ‘appropriate modification, adaptations and/or adjustments’ to enable PwDs ‘to have access to, participate in, or advance in employment...and in work environment that is open, inclusive and accessible’. This duty is required to be transposed into national law and is considered a ‘substantive equality measure having the potential to result in fundamental structural transformations’ Employers are expected to take action only if ‘accommodation’ does not lead to excessive costs or turns into ‘a disproportionate burden’ (Waddington, 2008)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call