Abstract

In late 2020 the Government of Alberta’s Ministry of Advanced Education sent a guidance document to Alberta post-secondary institutions to lay out how work-integrated learning was to be conducted. This document also informed the institutions that work-integrated learning should be included in all future program proposals. The guidelines were sent without the context or purpose stated. This paper applies Carol Bacchi’s “What’s the Problem Represented to be” post-structural policy discourse analysis to the Ministry of Advanced Education guidelines. There is a broad consensus in work-integrated learning research that work-integrated learning is beneficial for participants beyond employment outcomes. However, this analysis shows the Ministry of Advanced Education’s representation of the problem displays an assumption that the purpose of work-integrated learning is to improve labour market outcomes. The analysis also spotlights that the likely effects of the policy have more to do with making work-integrated learning programs easier to assess than to improve student education. This paper proposes an alternative framework that would integrate the constructivist and humanistic origin of work-integrated learning and allow institutions to develop appropriate experiential learning components for their programs while still standardizing work-integrated learning components across and within institutions. This proposed framework can improve work-integrated learning programs in Canada by widening the focus beyond human capital theory.

Highlights

  • Background and AssumptionsWork-Integrated Learning (WIL) is a form of experiential learning (EL) where students engage in authentic meaningful work experience that is connected to the curriculum of their program

  • It revealed that the Ministry is working toward making Work-integrated learning (WIL) easier to assess between and within institutions at a macrolevel, especially for purposes of performance-based funding (PBF) being rolled out in Fall 2021

  • More research should be done into employer perspective on the benefits of WIL in Alberta and on the use of accountability systems such as PBF to encourage WIL

Read more

Summary

Background and Assumptions

Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) is a form of experiential learning (EL) where students engage in authentic meaningful work experience that is connected to the curriculum of their program. WIL provides an opportunity for transformative learning through reflection on experience. The indented outcomes of WIL are improved learning and understanding, as well as helping students in their self-development and self-reflection. 345) that are assessed by the post-secondary institution (PSI) as well as the employer or supervisor and must be designed so that the learning will support students’ program learning. The quality of WIL components in programs should be assessed based on how well it connects students to labour market experiences, how well it supports their gaining of new learning, and the quality and engagement of the reflective component

Objective
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.