Abstract

This study was carried out to identify the social impact of losing transport links within a community, and the practices of coordination and communication during and after an extreme adverse event. In November 2009, Workington, Cumbria had most of its bridges either damaged or destroyed during a major flood. The effects of the disaster were immediate, while the subsequent planning and recovery process took time. Over 3 years, Cumbria County Council (CCC) went through a coordinated process of installing temporary infrastructure, building and repairing Workington's bridges. A desk-based investigation of the disaster and the recovery process using websites and the local press demonstrates a coordinated approach to replace Workington's infrastructure and the importance of communication in the town's recovery. CCC, through a series of practical measures, reduced disruption within the community in stages. The reconstruction of the town's bridges involved communication and public consultation about the new infrastructure. The CCC explained the design, financial and engineering elements of the bridges to the public with some success. The research found that the loss of each bridge had significant social impacts, and the coordinated actions and communication of CCC helped the community understand and, importantly, accept that reconstruction would not be immediate.

Highlights

  • In November 2009, Workington, Cumbria had the majority of its bridges either damaged or destroyed during a major flood

  • When County Council (CCC) announced there was a suitable site but there was an issue with one landowner not allowing permission, there was public outcry with 39 comments being posted in the local press

  • The process of gathering and analysing the data shows that the recovery process in Workington had complex interdependencies, which include economic, social, environmental, technical, 114 Downloaded by [] on [08/11/21]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In November 2009, Workington, Cumbria had the majority of its bridges either damaged or destroyed during a major flood. Over the 3 years, Cumbria County Council (CCC) and their contractors replaced the infrastructure with temporary bridges and permanent bridges. This paper examines the issues that emerged during rebuilding the town’s bridges. CCC was tasked with coordinating and communicating the recovery process to the regional population.

Background
Workington’s recovery
30 November 2009 1–7 December 2009 21 April 2010 14 May 2010
Constructing temporary infrastructure
Constructing permanent infrastructure
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.