Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that performance in working memory (WM) tasks is deficient in all etiologies and at all levels of intellectual disability (ID). Knowledge about WM structure, cognitive processes reflected in WM tasks, or the long-term memory contribution to WM capacity in ID is, however, not satisfactory. In the present study, WM capacity, WM task requirements, as well as effects between WM, skills, knowledge base, and intelligence were explored in two groups with matched fluid intelligence: adult persons with ID and normally developing children aged 3–6 years. The ID Group performed equally well as the children in WM tasks based on familiar semantic information and were significantly better on all measures reflecting skills and knowledge base. The Child Group performed better in phonological and visuo-spatial WM tasks including nonsemantic information, respectively. In particular, it appeared that the groups differed in their WM performance although they were matched for fluid intelligence. We hypothesize that the ID Group depended more on knowledge support from long-term memory whereas the Child Group could benefit more from efficient online WM processes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.