Abstract
We investigate what is behind the profit/not–for-profit wage differential by comparing judgments on job characteristics of workers who voluntarily or involuntarily moved from the former to the latter. We define voluntary movers as those who applied for a job in a not-for-profit organization and, when successful, resigned from their for profit position, while involuntary movers can either have been laid off by the company or have resigned without already having a job offer in the not-for-profit sector when leaving the firm. We observe that almost half of voluntary movers end up without higher wages, but with higher job satisfaction after the change. A vast majority of them exhibit significantly higher time flexibility, improved relationships with stakeholders, closer consistency with educational skills and higher satisfaction of intrinsic motivations in the new job. Our findings support the profit/no profit compensating differential hypothesis and shed light on mechanisms which are beyond the donative behaviour of intrinsically motivated workers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.