Abstract
This commentary responds to Grossman and Trubina's (2022) article, ‘Dignity in Urban Geography: Starting a Conversation’. I consider their argument and framework for integrating a formal conceptualization of dignity into urban geography research, including the challenges they face in nailing down this slippery, abstract concept, and the many contributions their application presents to the field. In particular, I focus on the relationship between dignity and work – which is notably absent from their discussion but nonetheless presents a productive line of inquiry given the analytical framework they construct.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
