Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of Workers’ Compensation (WC) status on postoperative healthcare utilization in hand and wrist surgery clinical practice is presently unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the number of postoperative visits in WC to non-WC patients after common upper extremity surgical procedures.MethodologyAll patients who underwent one of four common surgical procedures (carpal tunnel release, De Quervain’s release, cubital tunnel release, and trigger finger release) between 2016 and 2019 were identified. A total of 64 surgeries billed under WC were randomly selected and matched 1:1 to surgeries billed outside of WC based on the primary CPT code.ResultsThe most common procedure was carpal tunnel release (42 patients), followed by trigger finger release (30 patients), cubital tunnel release (28 patients), and De Quervain’s release (16 patients). The average number of postoperative visits was 2.3 (median = 2, range: 1-9) and was significantly higher in the WC group (mean/median = 3.0/3 versus 1.5/1, p < 0.001). Within the 90-day global postoperative billing period, the mean number of visits was 2.2 (median = 2, range: 1-4) in the WC group and 1.4 (median = 1, range: 1-3) in the non-WC group (p < 0.001). The average time to clinical discharge in the WC group was 101 days (range: 10-446 days), and in the non-WC group was 40 days (range: 7-474 days) (p < 0.001). Five patients (7.8%) in the WC group and four patients (6.3%) in the non-WC group were seen for unplanned visits after clinical discharge.ConclusionsWC status conferred more postoperative visits after common upper extremity surgical procedures, both within and beyond the global billing period. Further investigation and targeted strategies are required to address the observed increase in healthcare utilization.

Highlights

  • The impact of Workers’ Compensation (WC) insurance status on the clinical outcomes after surgery has been well described in the literature

  • Five patients (7.8%) in the WC group and four patients (6.3%) in the non-WC group were seen for unplanned visits after clinical discharge

  • WC status could represent a substantial resource burden for treating surgeons and affected patients if it confers a higher number of clinical visits after surgery, within the 90-day postoperative global billing period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The impact of Workers’ Compensation (WC) insurance status on the clinical outcomes after surgery has been well described in the literature. WC patients in hand and wrist surgical practice have been shown to require a higher number of clinical visits and more diagnostic testing prior to surgery than non-WC patients [10]. WC status could represent a substantial resource burden for treating surgeons and affected patients if it confers a higher number of clinical visits after surgery, within the 90-day postoperative global billing period. We sought to compare the number of postoperative visits after common upper extremity surgical procedures between WC and non-WC patients. The impact of Workers’ Compensation (WC) status on postoperative healthcare utilization in hand and wrist surgery clinical practice is presently unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the number of postoperative visits in WC to non-WC patients after common upper extremity surgical procedures

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call