Abstract

For the appropriate hygienic management of workplaces where workers handled nano-TiO2 products, the status of the personal exposure of workers to respirable dust (PM4) and nanoparticles (PM0.1) was investigated. Using a cyclone sampler for PM4 and a personal sampler for PM0.1, PM4 and PM0.1 exposure levels were evaluated to discuss them in relation to worker’s duties. The number of particles of 0.01–10 µm was also monitored online in order to examine the short-term fluctuation in the concentration and size distribution of particles. The 8h-time-weighted average (TWA) and 95% upper limit for respirable dust exposure were below the occupational exposure limit specified by the Japan Society for Occupational Health and the recommended exposure limits for TWA by NIOSH. The action level was exceeded during the filling of a flexible container bag. More than 70% of particles in the breathing zone was coarse agglomerates of > 1 µm, while it may be influenced by powder properties and the handling process as well as the management of local ventilation. The maximum PM0.1 concentration (31.3 µg m–3) occurred in a powder filling booth without air ventilation. The operation of a gasoline powered forklift temporarily increased the concentration of ultrafine particles. Most of TiO2 powder was suspended as micron-order agglomerates in the breathing zone. However, since PM0.1 exposure was much larger than those in outdoor environment particularly under insufficient cares to aerosolized powder and air ventilation, PM0.1 exposure should also be monitored.

Highlights

  • According to the development of nanomaterial manufacturing technologies (Ding et al, 2017), existing procedures for occupational exposure to airborne particulates have been requested to be updated by the nanomaterials industries (Leidel et al, 1977; British Occupational Hygiene Society, 1996; BSI, 1996; MHLW, 2010; AIHA, 2015; Japan Society for Occupational Health (JSOH), 2015)

  • The 8 hour time-weighted average (8hTWA) for Worker-B1 and -B2 in 2012 were, respectively, 247 and μg m–3, each of which cleared the occupational exposure limit (OEL) and recommended exposure limit of time-weighted average (REL-TWA) but exceeded the action level (AL, μg m–3) defined as 50% of the OEL for Worker-B1, where the AL is generally defined as 50% of the permissible-exposure level (PEL) (NIOSH, 1975)

  • Since 2014, the packing booth has been protected by transparent vinyl curtains so that it had a local ventilation system that was operated at the suction velocity that was measured at the inlet of the ventilator hood

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

According to the development of nanomaterial manufacturing technologies (Ding et al, 2017), existing procedures for occupational exposure to airborne particulates have been requested to be updated by the nanomaterials industries (Leidel et al, 1977; British Occupational Hygiene Society, 1996; BSI, 1996; MHLW, 2010; AIHA, 2015; JSOH, 2015). Very few case studies of breathing zone sampling of workers based on the actual measurement of worker’s exposure to NPs have been reported for nano-TiO2 Ichihara et al (2016) evaluated the personal exposure to nano-TiO2 using a Siutas cascade impactor for particles < 250 nm The reason for this is that only a few portable tools are available for measuring the degree of exposure to nanoparticles (< 100 nm) in the breathing zone of a worker and only a few commercial products capable of measuring nanoparticles are currently available (Furuuchi et al, 2010a; Tsai et al, 2011, 2012; Young et al, 2013; Thongyen et al, 2015; Asbach et al, 2017). The number concentration of particles in the 10 nm–10 μm size range was monitored online using a scanning mobility particle sizer and an optical particle counter at selected locations including various locations in the workplace in order to evaluate fluctuations in the concentration and size distribution of particles in relation to workers’ activities

Sampling and Monitoring Schedule
Workplace-A for Rutile TiO2 Nanopowder Production
B Anatase Photo catalyst Sulfate process
Workplace-B for Producing Anatase TiO2 Nanopowder
Monitoring of Particle Number Concentration
Evaluation of TiO2 Mass in Samples
2.10 Statistical Indices of TiO2 RPE
Respirable TiO2 Mass Concentrations
A1 A2 A2 A3 B1 A1 A1 A2 A3 B1 O2
Workplace-B
CONCLUSIONS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.