Abstract

Modern Russia is undergoing changes, including religion. In the Soviet Union, in contrast to the Western world, there was not only an active and rapid social secularization, but also a violent atheization of the population. As for the youth, due to the notorious atheism, there was a lack of youth’s religiosity. After the collapse of the USSR, it became necessary to implement effective measures so that Orthodoxy could adequately respond to the “challenge of the time”. Under these conditions, the organization of work with youth in the ROC began to revive. The major research objective was to study the Russian Orthodox Church’s main forms of work with youth in the post-Soviet period. Our research was conducted in the Ural region, one of the largest regions of the Russian Federation. The research methodology used a qualitative approach (in-depth interviews). Our research, based on informants’ opinions, has identified three forms of groups who work with the Russian youth through the Russian Orthodox Church. They are: traditional church forms (organizing groups for the study of the Holy Scriptures, doctrinal (catechism) classes, missionary activities, etc.), traditional secular forms (children’s and youth’s camps, young family clubs, sports and military-patriotic clubs, addiction prevention and social projects, etc.) and innovative forms (Internet projects, Internet communities, Orthodox forums, Orthodox cafes, bars, etc.). Our study has revealed that religious phenomena and manifestations of religiosity are observed in totally different areas, such as cultural, economic, educational, leisure, etc. The study has elucidated that the work of the Russian Orthodox Church fits into the framework of this paradigm, thus confirming T. Luckmann’s theory.

Highlights

  • In modern Russia, young people differ from other age groups in terms of their level of religiosity, which allowed some experts to start publicly discussing the impending crisis of faith among young people, similar to the processes taking place in Europe over the past thirty years (Bullivant 2018; Pollack 2008)

  • If the first generation were living in conditions of socio-cultural pluralism, the period of socialization of the second generation is characterized by clearly expressed attempts by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) to strengthen its influence on the spiritual life of society, which led to a decline in its authority among the new generation and a general decrease in the level of religiosity of the population, including young people

  • As for the youth who lived in the Soviet Union and the countries of Eastern Europe, due to the notorious atheism, there was a lack of religiosity among the vast majority of young people as a result of the repressive policies pursued by the communist regimes (Volokitina 2009a, 2009b; Murashko and Odintsov 2003; Murashko and Filimonova 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In modern Russia, young people differ from other age groups in terms of their level of religiosity, which allowed some experts to start publicly discussing the impending crisis of faith among young people, similar to the processes taking place in Europe over the past thirty years (Bullivant 2018; Pollack 2008). If the first generation were living in conditions of socio-cultural pluralism, the period of socialization of the second generation is characterized by clearly expressed attempts by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) to strengthen its influence on the spiritual life of society, which led to a decline in its authority among the new generation and a general decrease in the level of religiosity of the population, including young people. It does not mean an increase in the number of convinced atheists, but is about an increase in indifference towards religion. In this sense, belonging to Orthodoxy today may reflect not so much the internal religious beliefs and identity of a person, but rather be a marker of public expression of one’s position, especially among young people, in connection with certain events related to church institutions or the expression of public confidence in the ROC (Uzlaner 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call