Abstract
AbstractIn accordance with the framework of hyperelastic isotropic material description it appears possible to replace work‐conjugate stress and strain quantities by alternative pairs of work‐conjugate stress and strain quantities while other things left unaltered, i.e. based on a retained architecture of the strain energy density function. This replacement results in formally representing different kinds of material response behavior. This may be recognized from the various comparable forms of resulting uniaxial force versus axial stretch behavior in the representative 3D principal axes system. Clarifying and achieving comprehensive understanding of these observations is the main purpose of this paper.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
