Abstract
In Zulu, certain orthographic words seem to incorporate more than one syntactic category. Applying various syntactic tests to these forms shows that some of the morpheme sequences contained in them function syntactically as words, that is, the orthographic word and the syntactic word do not coincide. Forms shown to be syntactic words are the question morphemes -ni and -phi, the relative marker, certain of the 'adverbial formatives', nganga- 'as big as', and the past and remote past markers be- and (C)-a:-. If these findings are correct, then Khumalo's (1987) phonological rules must be seen to apply across word-boundaries, and not just word-internally. Also, syntactic rules must operate on features of the word, and not on morphemes as such. On the other hand, the demonstrative, which is sometimes argued to be a syntactic word, shows characteristics of an incorporated and subordinate form when it co-occurs with the noun. This finding would indicate that demonstratives are not always phrasal heads.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
